Wall v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s assertion of his right to a speedy trial two months before his trial began did not satisfy this Barker factor
• holding that a defendant’s assertion of his right to a speedy trial two months before his trial began did not satisfy this Barker factor
• recognizing that a defendant cannot claim anxiety of incarceration when serving time for another crime
• recognizing that a defendant cannot claim anxiety of incarceration when serving time for another crime
• finding that because the defendant provided no excuse and that his flight was probative of guilty knowledge “the flight instruction was appropriate”
• upholding a sentence of life without parole for possession of a controlled substance for a habitual offender

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).