Skip to main content
· 11/10/1999

Kimber v. Thiokol Corporation

Citations

  • 196 F.3d 1092
  • 23 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2542
  • 1999 Colo. J. C.A.R. 6350
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 29533
  • 1999 WL 1020834

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when “more than one interpretation” of a plan “is rational, the administrator can choose any rational alternative”
  • further noting that the \due to\ language was ambiguous and open to interpretation
  • adopting rule and discussing cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, Kelly, West

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.