Sirva Relocation, LLC v. Golar Richie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that proceeding implicated important state interests based on prior court decisions recognizing same
• noting that claims that a state proceeding is inadequate due to adjudicative delay are “undermine[d]” by a plaintiff’s “failure to pursue potentially available state judicial remedies”
• noting that claims that a state proceeding is inadequate due to adjudicative delay are “undermine[d]” by a plaintiffs “failure to pursue potentially available state judicial remedies”
• finding an ongoing proceeding where the agency “completed an investigation, issued a formal complaint, conducted a pre-hearing conference, and scheduled an adjudicative hearing”
• applying Younger abstention even where a private cause of action was available
• noting exceptions to Younger when “state proceeding is brought . . . for the purpose of harassment . . . if the state forum provides inadequate protection of federal rights [or] when a state statute is ‘flagrantly and patently violative of express constitutional prohibitions’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).