Skip to main content
· 6/4/1991

Jim L. Woolsey v. Marion Laboratories, Inc. Marion Laboratories, Inc., Profit Sharing Plan

Citations

  • 934 F.2d 1452
  • 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 360
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11126
  • 1991 WL 90983

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, “[g]iven the untimely filing of the motion and the lack of new information justifying the delay in adding a new claim, we find that the district court acted within its discretion in denying Woolsey’s motion to amend”
  • plan alternation alone not actionable even if done by disparate treatment
  • plan alternation alone not actionable even if done by disparate treatment
  • plan alternation alone not actionable even if done by disparate treat- ment
  • “Given the untimely filing of the motion and the lack of new information justifying the delay in adding a new claim, we find that the district court acted within its discretion in denying Woolsey’s motion to amend”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.