Skip to main content
· 8/13/2004

Shirley O. Fought v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America

Citations

  • 379 F.3d 997
  • 33 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1651
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 17009
  • 2004 WL 1803364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that an inherent conflict of interest, a proven conflict of interest, or a serious procedural irregularity reduces the deference owed to an administrator's decision to deny benefits
  • concluding that an inherent conflict of interest, a proven conflict of interest, or a serious procedural irregularity reduces the deference owed to an administrator’s decision to deny benefits
  • concluding that an inherent conflict of interest, a proven conflict of interest, or a serious procedural irregularity reduces the deference owed to an administrator’s decision to deny benefits
  • noting that courts are limited to the administrative record when reviewing for abuse of discretion
  • noting that courts are limited to the administrative record when reviewing for abuse of discretion
  • stating that “[u]nder ERISA, an insurer bears the burden to prove facts supporting an exclusion of coverage” and citing authorities requiring proof by a preponderance of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tacha, McKay, Henry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.