Skip to main content
· 11/17/1995

Cagle v. Bruner

Citations

  • 921 F. Supp. 726
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21020
  • 1995 WL 811934

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the federal common law claim of equitable es-toppel may be applied when an employee relies, to his detriment, on an interpretation of an ambiguous provision in a plan by a representative of that plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John H. Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.