· 7/30/1993
Richard H. Heasley, Sr. And Doris G. Heasley v. Belden & Blake Corporation
Citations
- 2 F.3d 1249
- 16 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2649
- 122 A.L.R. Fed. 645
- 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20070
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- looking to state common law contract rules when fashioning federal common law rules in an ERISA case
- adopting rule of contra proferentem in review of denial of insurance benefits under ERISA
- “[C]ourts have refused to rely exclusively on particular third-party classifications 12 where the plan has not explicitly referenced them. . . .”
- discretion can be express or implied in language of the Plan
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sloviter, Mansmann, Scirica
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.