Skip to main content
· 7/30/1993

Richard H. Heasley, Sr. And Doris G. Heasley v. Belden & Blake Corporation

Citations

  • 2 F.3d 1249
  • 16 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2649
  • 122 A.L.R. Fed. 645
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20070

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • looking to state common law contract rules when fashioning federal common law rules in an ERISA case
  • adopting rule of contra proferentem in review of denial of insurance benefits under ERISA
  • “[C]ourts have refused to rely exclusively on particular third-party classifications 12 where the plan has not explicitly referenced them. . . .”
  • discretion can be express or implied in language of the Plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Mansmann, Scirica

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.