Keith Mitchell v. Anthony Hedgpeth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that dispositive matters in this context includes those that are 25 analogous to the ones listed in section 636(b)(1)(A)
• concluding that a motion to stay and abey Section 2254 proceedings is generally, but not always, dispositive of unexhausted claims
• explaining that “magistrate judges may hear and determine nondispositive matters, but not dispositive matters”
• explaining that “magistrate judges may hear and determine nondispositive matters, but not dispositive matters”
• explaining that “magistrate judges may hear and determine nondispositive matters, but not dispositive matters”
• explaining that “magistrate judges may hear and determine nondispositive matters, but not dispositive matters”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).