Banjo v. Ayers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that Banjo’s delay of 146 days between the first and second petitions 21 filed in the superior court was unreasonable
• rejecting petitioner’s explanation he was 20 delayed while “continuing to develop evidence”
• “We employ a two-part test to determine whether the period between the denial of one petition and the filing of a second petition should be tolled.”
• “[The petitioner] bears the burden of proving that the statute of limitations was [statutorily] tolled.”
• “[The petitioner] bears the burden of proving that the statute of limitations was [statutorily] tolled.”
• “[The petitioner] bears the burden of proving that the statute of limitations was [statutorily] tolled.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).