Laura Flam v. Marshall Flam

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that motion to remand to state court is dispositive
• holding that a motion to 8 | remand is dispositive
• holding that a 14 motion to remand is dispositive
• “a magistrate judge presented with a motion for remand “should provide a 20 report and recommendation to the district court’”
• “[A] 23 magistrate judge presented with a motion for remand should provide a report and 24 recommendation to the district court that is subject to de novo review[.]”
• “Though the list contained in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) appears to be exhaustive . . . the Supreme Court has identified some judicial functions as dispositive notwithstanding the fact that they do not appear in the list.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).