Arthur Robbins, III v. Tom L. Carey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court was not required sua sponte to 7 consider whether it should stay and abey a mixed habeas petition
• recognizing that “a district court is not required to 22 consider, sua sponte, whether it should stay and abey a mixed habeas petition.”
• noting that the district courts are not required to consider sua sponte the stay and abeyance procedure
• concluding court not required to consider sua sponte whether it should stay and abey mixed petition or to inform petitioner of option, thus overruling Kelly in 28 part
• overruling Kelly to the 5 extent Kelly required court to sua sponte consider stay and abeyance
• explaining why a court has no obligation to consider the stay-and-abeyance option sua sponte

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).