Powershare, Inc. v. Syntel, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \the Court in Chapman [v. California
• \the Court in Chapman [v. California
• concluding a motion “to stay litigation pending the resolution of parallel arbitration proceedings”
• explaining that \one of the cardinal rules of contract interpretation\ is \that a document should be read to . . . render - 23 - [all its provisions] consistent with each other\ (quoting Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc., 514 U.S. 52, 63 (1995))
• collecting cases and holding motions to stay litigation and compel arbitration are non-dispositive motions, properly ruled on by a magistrate judge, and subject to a “clearly erroneous or contrary to law” standard of review
• “interpreting a contractual term [is] a question of law for the courts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).