Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/27/2004
Thompson v. State
Citations
- 593 S.E.2d 139
- 357 S.C. 192
- 2004 S.C. LEXIS 23
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating the lack of the victims name in the indictment did not render it invalid or insufficient
- victims name does not affect subject matter jurisdiction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore, Toal, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GunnSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-09-23· cited 77×
- State v. McINTIRESupreme Court of South Carolina· 1952-06-10· cited 30×
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-03-16· cited 30×
- State v. HightowerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1952-02-06· cited 28×
- Joseph v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-10-14· cited 22×
- State v. WilkesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-03-17· cited 20×
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1963-11-04· cited 14×
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-02-03· cited 9×
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1965-11-01· cited 3×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-10-26· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.