Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/8/1952
State v. SWEAT
Citations
- 70 S.E.2d 234
- 221 S.C. 270
- 1952 S.C. LEXIS 88
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding nature of offense of larceny was not changed when State amended indictment to change the name of the victim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fishburne, Baker, Stukes, Taylor, Oxner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-11-27· cited 35×
- Mike Milanovich and Virginia Milanovich v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1960-03-08· cited 33×
- Joseph v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-10-14· cited 22×
- State v. RutledgeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-12-31· cited 17×
- State v. MoultrieSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-10-22· cited 16×
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-10-14· cited 14×
- Weinhauer v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-01· cited 12×
- State v. McNeilCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1994-05-23· cited 7×
- State v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-12-15· cited 6×
- State v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-03-08· cited 5×
- The State v. Eddie Campbell, Jr.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-01-15· cited 2×
- James L. Carrier v. StateCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2023-10-04
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.