Skip to main content
· 10/12/1984

State v. Scipio

Citations

  • 322 S.E.2d 15
  • 283 S.C. 124
  • 1984 S.C. LEXIS 361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that sanctions for noncompliance with disclosure rules are within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion
  • stating robbery requires the felonious taking and carrying away of the goods of another against his will or without consent
  • finding in-court identification of defendant by victim was admissible even though victim failed to identify defendant in photographic lineup
  • the additional element of being armed with a deadly weapon distinguishes robbery and armed robbery
  • robbery is felonious taking and carrying away of goods of another, accomplished against will or without consent of other with force
  • robbery is felonious taking and carrying away of goods of another, accomplished against will or without consent of other with force

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ness, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.