· 10/12/1984
State v. Scipio
Citations
- 322 S.E.2d 15
- 283 S.C. 124
- 1984 S.C. LEXIS 361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that sanctions for noncompliance with disclosure rules are within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion
- stating robbery requires the felonious taking and carrying away of the goods of another against his will or without consent
- finding in-court identification of defendant by victim was admissible even though victim failed to identify defendant in photographic lineup
- the additional element of being armed with a deadly weapon distinguishes robbery and armed robbery
- robbery is felonious taking and carrying away of goods of another, accomplished against will or without consent of other with force
- robbery is felonious taking and carrying away of goods of another, accomplished against will or without consent of other with force
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ness, Gregory, Harwell, Chandler, Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.