Skip to main content

Jones v. State

Citations

  • 787 So. 2d 154
  • 2001 WL 456490

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding way juror was looking at defendant was facially neutral reason for exercising peremptory challenge of juror
  • reversing because trial court erred in ruling that defense's reasons for the strike were not facially gender-neutral and failing to engage in genuineness inquiry
  • reversing for new trial where court never engaged in a \genuineness\ analysis before it refused to let appellant strike prospective juror
  • reversing because trial court erred in ruling that defense’s reasons for the strike were not facially gender-neutral and failing to engage in genuineness inquiry
  • juror's prior jury service and defense counsel's discomfort with the way in which the juror was looking at the defendant \were clearly facially gender neutral\ reasons for peremptory challenge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.