Supreme Court of Florida· 4/5/2012

Hayes v. State

Citations

94 So. 3d 452
37 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 253
2012 WL 1123745
2012 Fla. LEXIS 639

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding trial court disregarded presumption of nondiscrimination when it required the defendant to disprove the State’s assertion of discriminatory intent
observing that “the genuineness of the explanation is the yardstick with which the trial court will determine whether or not the proffered reason is pretextual.”
noting that although Melbourne involved a claim of race-based discrimination in the use of a peremptory challenge, the same procedure applies to claims of gender-based discrimination
finding that one relevant circumstance a trial court can consider in determining the genuineness of a strike is whether the strike is “based on a reason equally applicable to an unchallenged juror.”
finding that one relevant circumstance a trial court can consider in determining the genuineness of a strike is whether the strike is “based on a reason equally applicable to an unchallenged juror.”
finding no genuineness inquiry was conducted when the court mistakenly considered defense counsel’s peremptory strike for cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canady, Labarga, Lewis, Only, Pariente, Perry, Polston, Quince

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.