James v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state's reason for striking Hispanic female, i.e., that she was a recent law graduate, was neutral and genuine
• finding that the peremptory strike was genuine even though a recent law graduate was not questioned about her legal training
• finding that the peremptory strike was genuine even though a recent law graduate was not questioned about her legal training
• juror's recent graduation from law school and indication during voir dire that she did not want to serve on the jury were both \race-ethnic-gender neutral reasons.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-02· cited 21×
• Cobb v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-09-18· cited 17×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-16· cited 9×
• Lidiano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-24· cited 9×
• Landis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-16· cited 8×
• Mitchell Landis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-16
• HIALEAH HOSPITAL, INC. v. JOSHUA MISIUS HAYES-BOURSIQUOT, etc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-03-24

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Melbourne v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-09-05· cited 356×
• Hernandez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-08· cited 13×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-09· cited 7×
• Wheeler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-10-04· cited 1×