Skip to main content

Anderson v. State

Citations

  • 750 So. 2d 741
  • 2000 WL 121499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that appellate courts look only to the facial neutrality of the reason in reviewing step 2
  • reversing because trial court erred in finding defense's reason for the strike not facially race or gender-neutral and failing to analyze the genuineness of the reason
  • reversing because trial court erred in finding defense’s reason for the strike not facially race or gender-neutral and failing to analyze the genuineness of the reason
  • reversing and holding that the trial court erred in finding that the defense’s reason for a peremptory strike was not facially race or gender-neutral and failing to carryout step three of the Melbourne analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levy, Goderich, and Green

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.