Watson v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court decision upholding peremptory challenge in case in which defense counsel did not contend State was wrong about the juror's claimed lack of interest
• trial court engaged in genuineness analysis required under Melbourne where it stated “[a]ll right. Very well. That’s a race neutral decision” in response to State’s proffered reason for strike
• trial court engaged in genuineness analysis required under Melbourne where it stated \[a]ll right. Very well. That's a race neutral decision\ in response to State's proffered reason for strike

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dorsey v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2003-12-18· cited 50×
• Hayes v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2012-04-05· cited 43×
• Lidiano v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-10-24· cited 9×
• Landis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-16· cited 8×
• Alonzo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-10-27· cited 6×
• Mitchell Landis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-16

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Melbourne v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1996-09-05· cited 356×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-02· cited 21×
• Carter v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-07-19· cited 17×
• Siprien v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-03-27· cited 3×