Murray v. Haley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing because trial court failed to conduct a Neil inquiry and require the striking party to offer a gender-neutral reason for the strike
• reversing because trial court failed to conduct a Neil inquiry and require the striking party to offer a gender-neutral reason for the strike
• rejecting appellee’s argument that appellant failed to satisfy step one of Melbourne where it was “apparent that the trial court understood the nature of the objection”
• all that is necessary is that the trial court understand the nature of the objection under step one of the Neil inquiry; courts should not elevate form over substance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).