Skip to main content

Simmons v. State

Citations

  • 940 So. 2d 580
  • 2006 WL 3052388

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that a juror’s spouse being a law enforcement officer was race-neutral on its face
  • finding that because the trial court focused on the fact the State offered a seemingly race-neutral reason and accepted that the State’s reason for the strike as helpful for the defense, the trial court bypassed the genuineness inquiry
  • reversing on same grounds as in Tetreault and distinguishing from prior cases where appellate courts affirmed, given that record did not disclose that the trial court ever reached step three
  • finding the court failed to conduct a genuineness inquiry when it merely stated, “That is a race-neutral reason. Whether or not we view it favorable for the State or favorable for the Defense, it is a race-neutral reason.”
  • \There are no specific words which the court must state to satisfy step three of the Melbourne analysis.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.