Supreme Court of Florida· 11/10/1994

Jones v. State

Citations

648 So. 2d 669
1994 WL 620797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding there was no error in admitting photographs that were relevant to show the condition and location of the body when discovered
observing that defendant reasonably could expect that police would not make warrantless seizure of his clothing, not found in plain view, in his hospital room
explaining that the lawful access requirement \ensures that the scope of the intrusion into Fourth Amendment rights is no greater than that already authorized in connection with the lawful entry\
Jones “had no reason to believe that third parties would enter his room to look for and seize his personal property.”
the weight to be given mitigating factors is within the trial court's discretion
“[E]ven if we were to find that Jones’[s] privacy interests were in no way compromised, there clearly was a meaningful interference with his constitutionally protected possessory rights when his effects were seized without a warrant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

61 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.