State v. Setzler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that BOLO was sufficient to give rise to reasonable suspicion justifying investigatory stop of car since information in BOLO was based upon comments made by the robbery victim
• holding that, on review of an order on a motion to suppress, the trial court's findings of fact bind an appeals court, unless the findings are clearly erroneous
• holding reviewing court bound by fact findings \even if only implicit\
• BOLO for a “cream colored pick-up with three black males leaving the scene of a robbery”
• “A reviewing court is bound by the trial court’s findings of fact—even if only implicit—made after a suppression hearing, unless they are clearly erroneous.”
• “A reviewing court is bound by the trial court’s findings of fact— even if only implicit — made after a suppression hearing, unless they are clearly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).