Skip to main content

Joiner v. State

Citations

  • 825 S.W.2d 701
  • 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 25
  • 1992 WL 24193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • utilizing similar psychiatric credentials to uphold trial court's admission of expert testimony about future dangerousness
  • utilizing similar psychiatric credentials to uphold trial court’s admission of expert testimony about future dangerousness
  • upholding the admission of future dangerousness testimony based on similar credentials
  • upholding the admission of future dangerousness testimony based on similar credentials
  • Rule 403 envisions exclusion of evidence only when there is a \clear disparity between the degree of prejudice of the offered evidence and its probative value\
  • Rule 403 excludes “certain evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird, Benavides, Clinton, Maloney, McCORMICK, Part II

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

96 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.