Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 11/20/1996
State v. Johnson
Citations
- 939 S.W.2d 586
- 1996 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 233
- 1996 WL 668592
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming suppression of evidence from subsequent searches as “fruit” of evidence obtained illegally by private citizens
- affirming trial court’s order excluding evidence where decedent’s son’s broke into a funeral home, searched and found evidence related to decedent’s murder, and turned evidence over to police
- Jenschke succeeded in suppressing evidence obtained by private individuals who burglarized his truck
- “No doubt, the plain language of art. 38.23 supports the conclusion that the unlawful or unconstitutional actions of all people, governmental and private alike, fall under the purview of Texas’ exclusionary rule.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meyers, McCormick, White, Mansfield, Keller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kothe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-10-20· cited 930×
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-06-09· cited 424×
- Oldham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-09-30· cited 392×
- Miles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-10-17· cited 162×
- Cobb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-29· cited 143×
- Kober v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-03-10· cited 124×
- Krause v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-10-31· cited 119×
- Chavez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-01-12· cited 109×
- Pitonyak v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-04-25· cited 89×
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2007-08-31· cited 84×
- Hatch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-12-10· cited 79×
- Ruiz, Lauro EduardoCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2019-07-03· cited 70×
- Woods v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-06-25· cited 63×
- Schultze v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-10-05· cited 56×
- Kimball Douglas Hailey II v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-10-18· cited 56×
- Rodriguez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1997-07-03· cited 54×
- Jenschke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2004-10-20· cited 51×
- Davis v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2000-07-20· cited 45×
- Martin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-12-14· cited 45×
- State v. BaizeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-12-09· cited 41×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,080×
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-09· cited 1,829×
- Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court· 1921-06-01· cited 1,253×
- Walter v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1980-06-20· cited 793×
- Fuller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-03-25· cited 484×
- Bauder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-05-08· cited 442×
- United States v. MoniaSupreme Court· 1943-02-08· cited 413×
- Brimage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-01-10· cited 376×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-03-09· cited 204×
- State v. DaughertyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-06-26· cited 179×
- Anderson v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueSupreme Court· 1993-05-24· cited 117×
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-03-25· cited 112×
- State v. ComeauxCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-07-03· cited 90×
- Gillett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-10-17· cited 39×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.