Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/12/2000

Chavez v. State

Citations

9 S.W.3d 817
2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 6
2000 WL 21091

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that appellant lacked standing under article 38.23(a) to complain about seizure of evidence because it was not obtained in violation of her rights
deciding that defendant did not have standing under article 38.23 “to complain about the seizure of the” evidence because property was not obtained “in violation of [the defendant]’s rights”
holding that because appellant lacked standing to complain about the seizure of cocaine when it was not obtained in violation of his rights, he was not entitled to an article 38.23 instruction
holding that because appellant lacked standing to complain about the seizure of cocaine when it was not obtained in violation of his rights, he was not entitled to an article 38.23 instruction
“Appellant lacks standing to complain about the seizure of the cocaine because [the police officer] did not obtain the cocaine in violation of appellant’s rights.”
all noting there must be a causal connection between improper police conduct and collection of evidence before evidence can be excluded under Article 38.23

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCormick, Mansfield, Keller, Womack, Keasler, Price, Meyers, Holland, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.