Maixner v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding intervening circumstances when appellant had been released from custody and informed he was free to leave, however, he chose to stay because he A wanted to get everything out in the open @
• where defendant was advised of rights “several times,” this factor was “important factor” supporting conclusion that statement was obtained as a result of illegal arrest
• warrantless arrest of defendant in a local night club, prompted by concern that he might flee if he saw media coverage of officers’ discovery of murder victim, was not justified
• warrantless arrest of defendant in a local night club, prompted by concern that he might flee if he saw media coverage of officers' discovery of murder victim, was not justified
• police conduct was not flagrant because Maixner was released from custody and free to leave after police learned they mistakenly violated state law in arresting him; he chose to remain at the station and give a statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).