Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 770 A.2d 506
  • 2001 WL 121131

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that there was untainted evidence of guilt where there was a shoe print analysis, handwriting and fingerprint analysis, and the defendant’s letter admitting guilt
  • noting the “the troubling nature” of implicit promises of leniency in exchange for the testimony of witnesses
  • “When the Brady rule is violated, postconviction relief can not be barred by Rule 61 (i)(3
  • . . . ―‗[T]he Court concludes that counsel made a reasonable tactical decision to forgo such testing in order to focus their efforts on creating a reasonable doubt about [defendant‘s] guilt.‘‖
  • “Under Delaware law, the jury is the sole trier of fact, responsible for determining witness credibility and resolving conflicts in testimony. Jurors should have every opportunity to hear impeachment evidence that may undermine a witness‟ credibility.” (citations omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Walsh, Holland, Berger, Steele

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.