Skip to main content

Allen v. State

Citations

  • 644 A.2d 982
  • 1994 Del. LEXIS 131
  • 1994 WL 421572

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • comparing the remoteness prong of Getz to the timeframe under Rule 609(b)
  • “[A] lengthy time lapse can render the evidence legally irrelevant. Temporal remoteness depreciates or reduces the probative value of the evidence.” (quoting EDWARD J. IMWINKELRIED, UNCHARGED MISCONDUCT EVIDENCE § 8:08, at 8–16 (1992)
  • endorsing a \sliding scale\ approach balancing remoteness with relevance
  • endorsing a \sliding scale\ approach balancing remoteness with relevance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Walsh, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.