Skip to main content

Cannon v. State

Citations

  • 127 A.3d 1164
  • 2015 Del. LEXIS 592
  • 2015 WL 6935921

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying amended Rule 61 to a motion filed merely six months after Rule 61 was amended
  • applying amended Rule 61 to a motion filed six months after Rule 61 was amended
  • “We have previously held that because the wrongdoing at the OCME was not known until 2014, incidents not falling within the relevant time period fail to qualify as Brady violations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holland, Yalihura, Seitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.