Skip to main content

Starling v. State

Citations

  • 130 A.3d 316
  • 2015 Del. LEXIS 665
  • 2015 WL 8758197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Where there are multiple errors in a trial, the Court must weigh their cumulative effect . . . .” (emphasis added)
  • “Although Rule 61(i)(5) was amended on June 4, 2014, we must apply the version that existed at the time [the defendant] filed his Rule 61 motion.”
  • “We review ineffective assistance of counsel claims and alleged Brady violations de novo.”
  • “The likelihood of a different result must be substantial not just conceivable.”
  • finding cumulative impact based on multiple claims of ineffectiveness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Strine, Holland, Valihura, Vaughn, Seitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

58 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Starling v. State

51 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.