Ohio Court of Appeals· 4/6/2026
In re R.C.
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 1244
Syllabus
Suppression; Miranda; Custodial Interrogation; Voluntary Statement. The trial court did not err by denying R.G's and R.C.'s motions to suppress statements made to law enforcement because Miranda warnings were unnecessary and their statements were voluntary.
Judges: Zimmerman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 5,473×
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court· 1984-07-02· cited 4,856×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1995-07-26· cited 1,439×
- J. D. B. v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 563×
- In re R.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-08-18· cited 9×
- State v. BrockerOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-08-24· cited 9×
- In re K.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2009-06-29· cited 8×
- In re R.L.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-14· cited 8×
- In re D.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-30· cited 7×
- State v. CarterOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-10-25· cited 4×
- State v. A.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-27· cited 4×
- In re A.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-12-01· cited 3×
- In re S.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.