Grogan v. Garner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prior finding by preponderance standard cannot be given collateral estoppel effect in proceeding governed by clear and convincing standard
• holding that preponderance of the evidence is applicable standard for exceptions to discharge under section 523(a)
• concluding that the appropriate standard of proof for § 523(a) actions is by a preponderance and suggesting that it is the same under § 727
• holding that evidentiary questions involving the discharge of individual debts under 11 U.S.C. § 523 should be judged under a “preponderance” standard
• holding that the \standard of proof for the dischargeability exceptions\ in 11 U.S.C. § 523(a) is the ordinary preponderance-of-lhe-evidence standard
• holding that preponderance of the evidence standard, rather than clear and convincing standard, applies to all exceptions to discharge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).