In Re Mullen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• when applicable, ACP is a temporal requirement not a monetary requirement
• “Before the BAPCPA effective date, ‘projected disposable income’ usually was calculated by multiplying the difference between Schedule I income and Schedule J expenses by the estimated length of the Plan, consistent with the requirement of § 1322(a)(1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Coop v. Frederickson (In Re Frederickson)
  Eighth Circuit· 2007-09-24· cited 55×
• Pak v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Pak)
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-11-07· cited 44×
• In Re Meek
  D. Idaho· 2007-06-27· cited 22×
• In Re Wilson
  M.D. North Carolina· 2008-03-03· cited 18×
• In Re Rush
  W.D. Missouri· 2008-04-24· cited 11×
• In Re Moose
  E.D. Virginia· 2009-11-12· cited 10×
• eCast Settlement Corp. v. May (In Re May)
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-01-28· cited 10×
• In re Ramos
  D. Puerto Rico· 2013-06-04· cited 5×
• In Re Vidal
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2009-10-12· cited 4×
• In Re Reed
  D. Oregon· 2011-08-09· cited 4×
• In re Diaz
  W.D. Texas· 2018-05-14· cited 2×
• David D. Coop v. Craig M. Frederickson
  Eighth Circuit· 2007-09-24

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation
  Supreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 1,012×
• In Re Hardacre
  N.D. Texas· 2006-03-06· cited 214×
• In Re Alexander
  E.D. North Carolina· 2006-06-30· cited 153×
• In Re Jass
  D. Utah· 2006-03-22· cited 142×
• In Re Slusher
  D. Nevada· 2007-01-17· cited 119×
• In Re McGuire
  W.D. Missouri· 2006-06-01· cited 93×
• In Re Schanuth
  W.D. Missouri· 2006-05-25· cited 48×
• In Re Grady
  N.D. Georgia· 2006-06-21· cited 47×
• In Re Kibbe
  D. New Hampshire· 2006-04-14· cited 42×
• In Re Fuger
  D. Utah· 2006-06-29· cited 39×
• In Re Dew
  N.D. Alabama· 2006-06-21· cited 31×
• In Re Davis
  E.D. Michigan· 2006-08-21· cited 31×
• In Re Risher
  W.D. Kentucky· 2006-07-12· cited 27×
• In Re Girodes
  M.D. North Carolina· 2006-09-20· cited 21×
• In Re Balcerowski
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2006-10-17· cited 17×
• In Re Anderson
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-04-12· cited 15×
• In Re Schiffman
  D. Oregon· 2006-03-02· cited 12×
• In Re Beasley
  C.D. Illinois· 2006-05-08· cited 10×