Court of Appeals of Maryland· 3/18/1997
Hunt v. State
Citations
- 691 A.2d 1255
- 345 Md. 122
- 1997 Md. LEXIS 35
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “defense counsel’s acceptance of the jury panel was sufficient to bar any subsequent objection thereto”
- noting that \defense counsel's acceptance of the jury panel was sufficient to bar any subsequent objection thereto\
- rejecting that argument in the context of a post conviction challenge to the constitutional adequacy of a reasonable doubt instruction
- rejecting that argument in the context of a post conviction challenge to the constitutional adequacy of a reasonable doubt instruction
- stating that there are no magic words that must be included in a reasonable doubt instruction for it to be acceptable
- stating that there are no magic words that must be included in a reasonable doubt instruction for it to be acceptable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Karwacki, Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Merzbacher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-07-28· cited 144×
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-18· cited 99×
- Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-28· cited 82×
- Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-06-05· cited 70×
- Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-19· cited 58×
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-03-05· cited 57×
- Rivera-Moreno v. Government of the Virgin IslandsSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2014-09-26· cited 51×
- Conyers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-05· cited 49×
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2008-10-15· cited 38×
- Savoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-06-23· cited 36×
- State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-04-08· cited 35×
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-06-05· cited 34×
- Cirincione v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-02-02· cited 33×
- Boulden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-14· cited 31×
- Morris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-04-29· cited 30×
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1998-03-26· cited 30×
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-09-21· cited 29×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2015-07-13· cited 29×
- Ford Motor Co. v. WoodCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1998-01-08· cited 28×
- Ruffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2006-08-31· cited 27×
Cites
86 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court· 1938-05-31· cited 10,545×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-02-24· cited 7,003×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 3,950×
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1968-05-20· cited 3,740×
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court· 1961-06-05· cited 3,697×
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 3,512×
- Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1975-01-21· cited 2,446×
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1976-06-21· cited 2,305×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court· 1984-01-18· cited 1,407×
- Bottoson v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1984-10-01· cited 793×
- Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-03-13· cited 738×
- Francis v. HendersonSupreme Court· 1976-05-03· cited 650×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1973-04-17· cited 543×
- United States v. WoodSupreme Court· 1936-12-07· cited 521×
- California v. TybergSupreme Court· 1986-12-01· cited 383×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.