Skip to main content

Hunt v. State

Citations

  • 691 A.2d 1255
  • 345 Md. 122
  • 1997 Md. LEXIS 35

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “defense counsel’s acceptance of the jury panel was sufficient to bar any subsequent objection thereto”
  • noting that \defense counsel's acceptance of the jury panel was sufficient to bar any subsequent objection thereto\
  • rejecting that argument in the context of a post conviction challenge to the constitutional adequacy of a reasonable doubt instruction
  • rejecting that argument in the context of a post conviction challenge to the constitutional adequacy of a reasonable doubt instruction
  • stating that there are no magic words that must be included in a reasonable doubt instruction for it to be acceptable
  • stating that there are no magic words that must be included in a reasonable doubt instruction for it to be acceptable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Karwacki, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

86 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.