District of Columbia· 2/6/2007
Howard v. Gutierrez
Citations
- 474 F. Supp. 2d 41
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8249
- 2007 WL 404352
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that res judicata did not bar plaintiffs Rehabilitation Act claim where, if she had pleaded the claim in her initial. Title VII complaint, it would have been dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust her administrative remedies
- noting, with disapproval, plaintiffs’ decision to wait three months to file an extension of time to move for class certification after defendant’s motion to dismiss raised the untimeliness argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District of Columbia· 2013-03-25· cited 88×
- West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia· 2008-03-21· cited 39×
- Doe v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict of Columbia· 2009-10-06· cited 37×
- Janet Howard v. Penny PritzkerD.C. Circuit· 2015-01-06· cited 31×
- Artis Ex Rel. SA v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2008-03-20· cited 23×
- Herbert v. SebeliusDistrict of Columbia· 2013-02-25· cited 21×
- Mackinac Tribe v. JewellDistrict of Columbia· 2015-03-31· cited 17×
- Howard v. GutierrezDistrict of Columbia· 2008-08-18· cited 15×
- Sellers v. El Paso Industrial Energy, L.P.Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2009-02-10· cited 13×
- Jordon v. QuanderDistrict of Columbia· 2012-08-09· cited 9×
- Capitol Speciality Insurance v. Sanford Wittels & Heisler, LLPDistrict of Columbia· 2011-06-27· cited 8×
- Baird v. HOLWAYDistrict of Columbia· 2008-03-07· cited 8×
- Smith v. Ergo Solutions, LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2015-03-30· cited 7×
- In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATIONDistrict of Columbia· 2009-07-02· cited 6×
- Gumpad v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict of Columbia· 2014-02-25· cited 5×
- Little v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2015-04-23· cited 5×
- Belton v. ShinsekiDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-23· cited 5×
- Kretchmar v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict of Columbia· 2014-03-27· cited 4×
- Howard v. GutierrezDistrict of Columbia· 2012-09-19· cited 3×
- Gregorio v. GordonDistrict of Columbia· 2015-06-29· cited 1×
Cites
47 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court· 2007-01-22· cited 10,443×
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court· 1990-06-27· cited 5,583×
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court· 1984-05-22· cited 5,292×
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court· 1993-03-24· cited 5,239×
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court· 2001-05-29· cited 3,343×
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court· 1991-01-22· cited 3,247×
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court· 1993-03-03· cited 2,968×
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-02-24· cited 2,939×
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court· 2005-04-19· cited 2,236×
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court· 1974-02-25· cited 2,015×
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1994-03-01· cited 1,980×
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncD.C. Circuit· 2000-06-27· cited 1,335×
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court· 2001-02-27· cited 1,165×
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2004-01-30· cited 1,014×
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court· 1983-06-13· cited 967×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.