Jordon v. Quander

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that “the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to entertain plaintiff’s claims for money damages against [the United States, the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency,] or any of its employees sued in their official capacities”
• concluding “[o]n careful review of [plaintiff's] complaint, and its vague and unsupported allegations of harassment, threats, assaults and government surveillance . . . that the balance of plaintiff's claims must be dismissed as frivolous”
• granting motions to dismiss where plaintiff did not name “proper defendant” in Title VII claim
• dismissing claims as frivolous due to the plaintiff’s “vague and unsupported allegations of harassment, threats, assaults and government surveillance”
• “Plaintiff alone bears the burden of establishing an equitable basis for excusing h[is] failure to file h[is] complaint within the 90-day limitations period.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).