Skip to main content
· 3/20/2008

Artis Ex Rel. SA v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 543 F. Supp. 2d 15
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21973
  • 2008 WL 746681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that hearing officer’s noting the parties agreement did not constitute a change in the parties’ legal relationship
  • holding that “[a]lthough a hearing officer may make a prevailing party determination, it is -5- in the province of the district court to make the ultimate decision as to who prevailed in an IDEA action” for the purpose of awarding attorney’s fees

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.