· 3/20/2008
Artis Ex Rel. SA v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 543 F. Supp. 2d 15
- 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21973
- 2008 WL 746681
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that hearing officer’s noting the parties agreement did not constitute a change in the parties’ legal relationship
- holding that “[a]lthough a hearing officer may make a prevailing party determination, it is -5- in the province of the district court to make the ultimate decision as to who prevailed in an IDEA action” for the purpose of awarding attorney’s fees
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John D. Bates
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.