Manco v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that K.S.A. 60-1507’s provision regarding second or successive motions is constitutional and is a procedural limitation with exceptions; and provision regarding deadline for filing is constitutional
• \Manco perceives he has the right to file a K.S.A. 60-1507 motion whenever he wants for issues he has previously raised that he claims have not been considered on the merits. That is simply not the law.\
• \Manco perceives he has the right to file a K.S.A. 60- 1507 motion whenever he wants for issues he has previously raised that he claims have not been considered on the merits. That is simply not the law.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).