Grossman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing de novo district court's denial of K.S.A. 60- 1507 motion based only on the motions, files, and records after preliminary hearing because appellate court is in just as good of a position as district court to consider merits
• reviewing de novo a district court's denial of a K.S.A. 60-1507 motion based only on the motions, files, and records after a preliminary hearing because the appellate court is in just as good of a position as the district court to consider the merits
• 60-1507 motion properly denied because defendant would be unable to elicit evidence to overcome his express and repeated admissions of drug use in violation of his probation terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Ingham
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2018-11-30· cited 242×
• Calhoun v. State
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2018-07-27· cited 13×
• Quinn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2022-11-23· cited 1×
• Bogguess v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2017-06-09
• Hartfield v. State
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2018-11-30

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 813×
• Sola-Morales v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2014-10-24· cited 489×
• Rowland v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2009-11-20· cited 134×
• Holmes v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2011-06-10· cited 94×
• State v. May
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2012-02-10· cited 89×
• State v. Kingsley
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2014-06-13· cited 76×
• Holt v. State
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2010-05-06· cited 75×
• State v. Dull
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2014-01-31· cited 75×
• State v. Neer
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1990-07-13· cited 74×
• City of Wichita v. Sealpak Co.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2005-06-03· cited 19×