In Re Rainsford J. Winslow and Winifred W. Winslow, Debtors. Rainsford J. Winslow and Winifred W. Winslow v. C. Gail Hunter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the agency’s redetermination 3 1 procedures “violated Plaintiffs’ due process rights” because they had no 2 opportunity to contest the fraud allegations against them
• holding federal courts have the inherent power pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 to impose filing restrictions on abusive litigants
• holding federal courts have the inherent power pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 to impose filing restrictions on abusive litigants
• ‘Winslows shall have ten days from the date of this order to file written objections to these proposed sanctions.”
• pro se debtors afforded leniency and who abuse the privilege to proceed in forma pauperis may give rise to the imposition of filing restrictions
• “[W]here, as here, a party has engaged in a pattern of litigation activity which is manifestly abusive, restrictions are appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).