Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “As a trial witness, it must be said that Dr. Sanghera was impeached on substantive points with his prior inconsistent statements and exhibited an unconvincing demeanor.” (citation omitted)
• “As a trial witness, it must be said that Dr. Sanghera was impeached on substantive points with his prior inconsistent statements and exhibited an unconvincing demeanor.” (citation omitted)
• \His unconvincing trial demeanor has been a factor in this determination.\
• “His unconvincing trial demeanor has been a factor in this determination.”
• “His unconvincing trial demeanor has been a factor in this determination.”
• Abbott’s Proposed Finding No. 90: “the ‘preferably’ language means that the membrane is optional when an in vivo sensor does not contact whole blood but that the membrane is required when the sensor contacts red blood cells [i.e., erythrocytes] in whole blood.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).