Faythe S. Takahashi and Hideo H. Takahashi v. Loomis Armored Car Service, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that a district court’s construction of state law, “particularly where there has been no clear state court exposition of a controlling principle, will be accepted on review 2 unless shown to be ‘clearly wrong.’”
• relying on precedent from other jurisdictions to predict how the Hawaii Supreme Court would interpret law related to worker’s compensation claims involving third-party torts
• federal court may look to well-reasoned decisions 20 from other jurisdictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).