Skip to main content
· 4/14/2008

United States v. Ibrahim

Citations

  • 522 F.3d 1003
  • 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 8360
  • 2008 WL 1700530

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that judicial estoppel is only appropriate where “a party’s later position is ‘clearly inconsistent’ with its original position”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wallace, Gould, Ikuta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.