· 4/14/2008
United States v. Ibrahim
Citations
- 522 F.3d 1003
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 8360
- 2008 WL 1700530
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that judicial estoppel is only appropriate where “a party’s later position is ‘clearly inconsistent’ with its original position”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wallace, Gould, Ikuta
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.