Skip to main content
· 4/24/1992

Dale A. Price, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-Appellant v. Thomas Seydel and Nalani Seydel, Husband and Wife, Defendants-Cross-Claimants-Appellees

Citations

  • 961 F.2d 1470
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3563
  • 23 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 178
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 5450
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 7595
  • 1992 WL 80975

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a federal court sitting in diversity applies state law in deciding whether to allow attorneys' fees when those fees are connected to the substance of the case
  • listing factors the trial court must consider 24 before excluding unlisted witnesses
  • it is within a district court’s discretion to deny a motion to set aside a default judgment if a defendant lacks a “meritorious defense”
  • a federal court applies state law in awarding attorney fees when those fees are connected to the substance of the case
  • district court abused discretion by not allowing plaintiff to call in his case-in-chief witness who was already listed on defendants' witness list and had prepared for cross-examination by plaintiff's attorney
  • exclusion of testimony which could have confirmed or disputed plaintiff's claims was prejudicial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Wright, Fernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.