· 10/26/2000
Estate of Hilda Ashman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Citations
- 231 F.3d 541
- 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8573
- 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11431
- 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1586
- 86 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6722
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 26829
- 2000 WL 1593403
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- allowing a taxpayer to recharacterize her previous representation would have resulted in “$100,502.21 tax free by misleading [the Commissioner]”
- “Even if the tax court does not have far- reaching general equitable powers, it can apply * * * equitable powers within its own jurisdictional competence.”
- “The mere fact that [the Commissioner] did not take steps against her, but accepted the return and let the statute of limitations run, demonstrates that he did rely.”
- “The mere fact that [the Commissioner] did not take steps against her, but ac‐ cepted the return and let the statute of limitations run, demonstrates that he did rely.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Scannlain, Fernandez, Rawlinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.