Skip to main content
· 10/26/2000

Estate of Hilda Ashman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Citations

  • 231 F.3d 541
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8573
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 11431
  • 25 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1586
  • 86 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6722
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 26829
  • 2000 WL 1593403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing a taxpayer to recharacterize her previous representation would have resulted in “$100,502.21 tax free by misleading [the Commissioner]”
  • “Even if the tax court does not have far- reaching general equitable powers, it can apply * * * equitable powers within its own jurisdictional competence.”
  • “The mere fact that [the Commissioner] did not take steps against her, but accepted the return and let the statute of limitations run, demonstrates that he did rely.”
  • “The mere fact that [the Commissioner] did not take steps against her, but ac‐ cepted the return and let the statute of limitations run, demonstrates that he did rely.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Scannlain, Fernandez, Rawlinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.