Skip to main content

Hees v. Burke Construction Inc.

Citations

  • 961 A.2d 373
  • 290 Conn. 1
  • 2009 Conn. LEXIS 4

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that attorney trial referee should have calculated damages in construction contract case by determining plaintiffs’ reasonable cost to complete or repair work, less unpaid balance on contract
  • “[b]ecause both readings of the statute are reasonable, we conclude that the statutory language is ambiguous in this case”
  • “[bjecause both readings of the statute are reasonable, we conclude that the statutory language is ambiguous in this case”
  • “[Tjhe law of contract damages limits the injured party to damages based on his actual loss caused by the breach.” (quoting Argentinis v. Gould, 219 Conn. 151, 592 A.2d 378, 381 (1991)).

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rogers, Norcott, Palmer, Zarella, Schaller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.