Skip to main content

Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. Hirschfeld

Citations

  • 224 Conn. 240
  • 618 A.2d 506
  • 1992 Conn. LEXIS 411

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court properly found that plaintiff had not proven bad faith when there was no \proof that the attorneys intentionally [drafted a noncompliant contract] in order to have an escape hatch\
  • proof of mere negligence fails to support showing of dishonest purpose
  • enforcement precluded because contract did not provide notice of homeowners’ cancellation rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Katz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. Hirschfeld

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.