State v. Marsh and McLennan Companies, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “defendants’ arguments with respect to the potentially duplicative nature of the damages and injuries pleaded in the state’s complaint implicate potential problems of proof rather than pleading”
• “defendants’ arguments with respect to the potentially duplicative nature of the damages and injuries pleaded in the state’s complaint implicate potential problems of proof rather than pleading”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).